Posted By KC on March 28, 2009
This is Part II of a two-part article on playing short-stacked in No Limit Texas Hold’em Tournaments, but avoiding getting too short-stacked. In Part I, I discussed the concept of The Plateau Theory and the Tumble Factor to help measure your chip stack status in a tournament. In Part II, I will discuss the types of hands that players may have when short-stacked and whether or not they are worthy of playing. For those of you who have not read Part I, or need a refresher, please take a peek at: Getting Too Short-Stacked - Part I.
In Part I of the two-part series, we discussed The Plateau Theory of viewing your chip stack and a new way to measure the size of your stack in a tournament - the Tumble Factor. Simply put, the Tumble Factor is:
((Chip Stack / (Big Blind + Small Blind)) - 1) * (Number of Players - 2) = Tumble Factor
That makes it look a lot more complicated than it is. Let’s look at an example.
With blinds at 200/400, you have a chip stack of 3,600 and 6 players at your table. Plugging it into the formula:
((3,600 / (400+200)) - 1) * (6-2) = 20
More simply put, if you fold every hand for the rest of the tournament, you can play 6 times around the table, but the last time, you will be all-in. So, you have 5 trips around the table before you lose all of your chips. Also, there are 4 hands in every circuit around the table that you don’t have pay a blind. So, 5 times 4 is 20.
So, now that we have a Tumble Factor, what do we do with it? Well, the Tumble Factor helps us decide how aggressive we need to be with our hand selection. There are five major zones to the Tumble Factor - I call them the DEFCONs. (more…)
Category: Math, Poker Articles, Poker Tournaments |
2 Comments »
Tags: Plateau Theory, Poker, Short Stack, Strategy, Tournaments, Tumble Factor